Legal Opinion
State v. Clark
Oregon Supreme Court
Decided March 27, 1905PublishedCited by 31 opinions
From Harney: Morton D. Clifford, Judge. E. E. Clark and John Lee Milam were convicted of horse stealing, and appeal.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Bean
The defendants were convicted of the crime of larceny. They appeal, assigning as error the overruling of a demurrer to the indictment on the ground that more than one crime is charged therein. The charging part of the indictment is. as follows:
“That said E. E. Clark and John Lee -Milam on the 14th day of June, A. D. 1903, in the County of Harney and State of Oregon, then and there being, and acting together, did then and there wrongfully, unlawfully and feloniously take, steal and ride away and drive away and lead away one mare and two geldings, said mare and one of said geldings being then…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Ben v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1853
- People v. JohnsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1890
- Woodford v. . People of the State of N.Y.New York Court of Appeals · 1875
- Lorton v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1841
- State v. BlissWashington Supreme Court · 1902
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- State v. LaundyOregon Supreme Court · 1922
- State v. CloutierOregon Supreme Court · 1979
- State v. WoolardOregon Supreme Court · 1971
- State v. WelchOregon Supreme Court · 1973
- State v. GilbertOregon Supreme Court · 1978
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.