State v. Morales
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtSchwab, C. J.
Defendant was convicted and separately sentenced for criminal activity in drugs by transporting heroin and criminal activity in drugs by possessing heroin. The two charges involved the same drugs at the same time and place. State v. Miller, 14 Or App 396, 513 P2d 508 (1973), prohibits separate judgments of conviction and sentences on these facts.
The substantive standards governing whether separate judgments of conviction can be entered and sentences imposed for violating related statutes or repeated violations of the same statute have been often discussed by the Supreme Court and this, court.…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- State v. FloranceOregon Supreme Court · 1974
- State v. WoolardOregon Supreme Court · 1971
- State v. WoolardOregon Supreme Court · 1971
- State v. WelchOregon Supreme Court · 1973
- State v. HoffmanOregon Supreme Court · 1963
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- State v. CloutierOregon Supreme Court · 1979
- State v. BernthNebraska Supreme Court · 1976
- State v. HomerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1975
- State v. GileCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
- State v. SandersCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1978
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.