Legal Opinion

Schooley v. Fletcher

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1873PublishedCited by 9 opinions

From the Marion Superior Court.

1Opinion of the CourtBuskirk, J.

The original action was by Fletcher and Churchman against Zeigler, Finch, and Schooley, upon a *87negotiable promissory note, executed by Zeigler and Finch, payable to Schooley, who indorsed it to the plaintiffs.

It does not appear from the record that Zeigler appeared and answered, or that he was defaulted, or that judgment was rendered against him.

The appellant answered the complaint by the general denial and payment. He also filed a cross complaint against the appellees, under sections 674 and 675 of the code, 2 G. & H. 308, 309, in which he averred, in substance, that Zeigler and Finch were…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Bowser v. RendellIndiana Supreme Court · 1869

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Houck v. GrahamIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  2. Knopf v. MorelIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  3. Porter v. WaltzIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  4. Nurre v. ChittendenIndiana Supreme Court · 1877
  5. Horn v. BrayIndiana Supreme Court · 1875

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API