Knopf v. Morel

It is alleged in tbe first paragraph of the -complaint that, on the 28th day of February, 1876, August Emerick executed a promissory note to George Buhl for *572one hundred dollars; that the appellee, Morel, signed it as surety; that the appellant, Knopf, endorsed the note as the co-surety of appellee; that no part of the consideration was received by any of the sureties; that, on the 5th day of September, 1876, judgment was recovered in an action on the note, brought before a justice of the peace, against Louis Knopf, Emerick and the appellee; that the judgment was-rendered upon default; that, “…