Claxton v. Pullman, Inc.

Quillian, Judge.

The defendant, appellant here, enumerates as error the admission of the sale order for the trailer in question. He contends that the sale order was inadmissible and should have been excluded because: (a) the warranty and conditions of sale were on the reverse side and were not included in the contract; (b) the sale order was not accepted as required by the contract.

The defendant urges that since the contract contains a provision, “See warranty and conditions of sale on reverse side,” which follows the signatures of the parties, this was insufficient to incorporate the warranty…