Legal Opinion
Kirkland v. John Deere Plow Co.
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided December 4, 1941No. 29169PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtFelton, J.
(After stating the foregoing facts.)
The court admitted in evidence an order to Amerieus Implement Company signed by the defendant for “one model-L tractor, 3-L-16 cult., 2 No. 12 spread bars.” The order provided: “All machines ordered herein are warranted as per printed warranty on other side.” All of the warranties on the back of the order were warranties of the John Deere Plow Company. The order further provided: “This order is signed in triplicate and covers the entire agreement between us.” The order was signed by the defendant and the Amerieus Implement Company. It also provided for the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- International Harvester Co. of America v. DillonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1906
- McCormick Harvesting Machine Co. v. AllisonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1902
- Brooks Bros. Lumber Co. v. Case Threshing Machine Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1911
- Case Threshing Machine Co. v. CookCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1910
- International Harvester Co. of America v. MorganCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1917
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Dugan v. TroutMissouri Court of Appeals · 1954
- Copeland v. GeiseCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1957
- Claxton v. Pullman, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1967
- General Elevator Co. v. Rotary Lift Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1950