Legal Opinion

Johnson v. Hill

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided May 10, 1965No. 2 CA-CIV 41PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KRUCKER, Chief Judge.

This appeal involves a dispute arising out of a medical partnership. The appellant (plaintiff below), Dr. Johnson, sought an accounting for his share of the net worth of the partnership from the defendants, Doctors Holbrook, Stephens, Hill and Goodin. The lower court, sitting without a jury, found for the defendants. No written findings of fact or conclusions of law were made by the court.

A chronological sequence of events will be discussed in order to understand the nature of the dispute.

In 1934, Dr. Holbrook entered into a medical partnership with Dr. Hill in Tucson,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Bohmfalk v. VaughanArizona Supreme Court · 1960
  2. Keyes v. NimsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
  3. Ellingson v. Walsh, O'Connor & BarnesonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
  4. Home Owners' Loan Corp. v. Bank of ArizonaArizona Supreme Court · 1939
  5. State v. GarciaArizona Supreme Court · 1964

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. J. Edward Day v. William H. AveryCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1977
  2. Hyatt Regency Phoenix Hotel Co. v. Winston & StrawnCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1995
  3. Myrland v. MyrlandCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1973
  4. Graver Tank & Manufacturing Co. v. Fluor Corp., Ltd.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1966
  5. Rich v. ClassMissouri Court of Appeals · 1982

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API