Legal Opinion

W.H. Marston Co. v. Fisheries Co.

California Supreme Court

Decided July 30, 1927No. Docket No. S.F. 11497PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

By the complaint herein, which contains twenty-six causes of action, plaintiff alleged an indebtedness against defendant, Central Alaska Fisheries Company, a corporation, evidenced by several promissory notes made and executed by Central Alaska Fisheries Company to the First National Bank of Berkeley, reduced by a few payments made thereon to the sum of $123,027.95, with interest, which indebtedness was assigned by W.H. Marston, as guarantor, to W.H. Marston Company. Said bank thereafter indorsed certain of said notes without recourse and contemporaneously therewith delivered the same to the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Redington v. CornwellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Yule v. BishopCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
  3. Yule v. BishopCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
  4. Wheeler v. BullCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Joe Balestrieri & Co. v. Commissioner of Internal Rev.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1949
  2. Drainage District No. 1 v. Kirkpatrick-Pettis Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1941
  3. Merner Lumber Co. v. BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
  4. Berrington v. WilliamsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
  5. Johnson v. Mortgage Guarantee Co.California Court of Appeal · 1931

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API