Legal Opinion

Wisconsin Bridge & Iron Co. v. Industrial Commission

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided June 22, 1936PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFowler, J.

This is a workmen’s compensation case. Parents of a deceased employee of the plaintiff applied for death benefits on the ground of dependency, and their petition was granted.

The appellant’s main contention is that the conclusion of the commission that the employer and employee were subject to the Wisconsin Compensation Act is one of law not supported by the facts found by the commission or shown by the evidence. The appellant is correct in its contention that the conclusion of the commission in the respect stated is subject to review. Tesch v. Industrial Comm. 200 Wis. 616, 229 N. W. 194. But…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Tesch v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1930
  2. Val Blatz Brewing Co. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1930
  3. Jutton-Kelly Co. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1936
  4. Salvation Army v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1935
  5. Wisconsin Granite Co. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1934

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Industrial Comm'n of Wis. v. McCartinSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. Industrial Indemnity Exchange v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
  3. McCartin v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1946
  4. Dunville v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1938
  5. New Park Mining Co. v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1954

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API