Legal Opinion

Pacchiana v. McAree

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided February 28, 2006No. AC 25567PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

BISHOP, J.

The defendant, Edward McAree, appeals from the judgment of dissolution, in which the trial court dissolved the parties’ marriage, ordered the defendant to pay a lump sum to the plaintiff, Katherine Pacchiana, and required him to pay counsel fees on behalf of the plaintiff. On appeal, the defendant claims that the court (1) improperly modified its dissolution judgment, and (2) abused its discretion by awarding the plaintiff a lump sum payment and attorney’s fees. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.

*63The following factual and procedural histoiy is relevant to our…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State v. PaduaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
  2. Pasquariello v. PasquarielloSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1975
  3. Blake v. BlakeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
  4. Jewett v. JewettSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
  5. Doe v. DoeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Hornung v. HornungSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2016
  2. McMellon v. McMellonConnecticut Appellate Court · 2009
  3. Hornung v. HornungSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2016
  4. Pacchiana v. McAREESupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API