Legal Opinion

Gierman v. Toman

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided October 23, 1962PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

77 N.J. Super. 18 (1962)

185 A.2d 241

WALTER GIERMAN, PLAINTIFF,

v.

ARTHUR J. TOMAN, ET AL., DEFENDANTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division.

Decided October 23, 1962.

Mr. Gabriel Kirzenbaum, attorney for plaintiff.

Mr. J. Schuyler Huff, attorney for defendants.

SCHWARTZ, J.S.C. (temporarily assigned).

Plaintiff by pretrial discovery (interrogatory) seeks to compel the defendant to state his "present personal net worth, including the following: (a) Describe and list bank accounts, real property, stocks, bonds, insurance, both life and casualty, and all other personal and real property; (b)…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Sinclair Refining Co. v. Jenkins Petroleum Process Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1933
  2. Rainier's Dairies v. Raritan Valley Farms, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1955
  3. Handelman v. HandelmanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1954
  4. Cabakov v. ThatcherNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1955
  5. McLuckie v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1888

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Lunsford v. MorrisTexas Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Leidholt v. District Court in and for City and County of DenverSupreme Court of Colorado · 1980
  3. Palmisano v. TothSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1993
  4. Herman v. Sunshine Chemical Specialties, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1993
  5. Campen v. StoneWyoming Supreme Court · 1981

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API