Legal Opinion

Ingalls v. Hertz Corp.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 30, 1996No. 499PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DEL SOLE, Judge:

Following the submission of a “Case Stated” and the presentation of trial briefs, the trial court issued an order granting judgment in favor of Appellee, Hertz Corporation, and rejecting Appellant’s claim that Hertz was required to provide underinsured motorist coverage. 1 This timely appeal followed.

The trial court was presented with the following facts. Appellant, Maura M. Ingalls was operating a vehicle rented from Appellee Hertz, a self-insurer, when it collided with another vehicle being operated negligently by Ray Poplas. Poplas was insured by Allstate Insurance Company…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Hackenberg v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation AuthoritySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  2. Gutman v. Worldwide InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Saunders v. JenkinsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
  2. Estate, Ralston v. Metro. Prop. Cas.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2001
  3. Smith v. Enterprise Leasing Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  4. Walker v. Pennsylvania Financial Responsibility Assigned Claims Plan, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API