Legal Opinion

Riddle v. Dyncorp International Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided January 5, 2012No. 11-10155PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

E. GRADY JOLLY, Circuit Judge:

The appellant brought a retaliation action against his former employer under the Federal False Claims Act 178 days after his termination. The district court, applying a 90-day limitations period borrowed from Texas state law, held that the appellant’s suit was untimely. We REVERSE the district court’s judgment and REMAND the case for further proceedings.

I

Michael Riddle once served as a senior employment manager for Dyncorp International, Incorporated (“Dyncorp”). He alleges that Dyncorp contracted to create a database for the United States government, but took no…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Sabine Pilot Service, Inc. v. HauckTexas Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Graham County Soil & Water Conservation District v. United States Ex Rel. WilsonSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
  3. United States v. Romeo Trinidad Flores, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1998
  4. Austin v. Healthtrust, Inc.-The Hospital Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Stroud v. VBFSB Holding Corp., Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1996

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Mike Townsend v. Bayer HealthCareCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2014
  2. United States ex rel. George v. Boston Scientific Corp.District Court, S.D. Texas · 2012
  3. Gibbs v. United StatesDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 2012
  4. United States v. BNP Paribas SADistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2012
  5. Leshinsky v. Telvent GIT, S.A.District Court, S.D. New York · 2012

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API