Legal Opinion

Blair v. State Bar

California Supreme Court

Decided November 13, 1989No. S006463PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

THE COURT.

This is a proceeding pursuant to Business and Professions Code section 6083, subdivision (a) and rule 952(a) of the California Rules of Court to review a recommendation by the Review Department of the State Bar Court that petitioner Clarence E. Blair be suspended from the practice of law for five years; that execution of the order be stayed; and that petitioner be placed on probation for five years subject to several conditions including an actual suspension of eighteen months, various reporting provisions, and supervision by a probation monitor.

The recommendation is based on…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Yokozeki v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Greenbaum v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Beery v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987
  4. Martin v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
  5. Guzzetta v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. In Re MorseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Aronin v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Bercovich v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Bates v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
  5. In Re SilvertonCalifornia Supreme Court · 2005

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API