Legal Opinion

United States v. Clark

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided February 26, 1980No. 78-1513PublishedCited by 143 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Marshall

This appeal presents the question whether illegitimate children of a federal civil service employee are entitled to survivors’ benefits under the Civil Service Retirement Act when the children once lived with the employee in a familial relationship, but were not living with the employee at the time of his death.

I

George Isaacson and the appellee Patricia Clark lived together from 1965 through 1971 without benefit of matrimony. They had two children, Shawn and Tricia Clark, born in 1968 and 1971, respectively, and the four lived together as a family. After the appellee and Isaacson separated,…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. United States v. TestanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Califano v. YamasakiSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Regents of the University of California v. BakkeSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. United States v. RainesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  5. Eastport Steamship Corporation v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1967

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by143 opinions

  1. Russello v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. United States v. X-Citement Video, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1994
  3. United States v. LockeSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. Bob Jones University v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. California v. Grace Brethren ChurchSupreme Court of the United States · 1982

138 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API