Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Miller v. Day

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided December 9, 1891No. 350PublishedCited by 1 opinion

From the Vanderburgh Superior Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Reinhard, J. —

Action by the State on the relation of Miller against Day and his sureties on his official bond, as constable, for refusing to set off to the former certain property claimed as exempt from sale on execution. A demurrer was sustained to the complaint, and this ruling is the only error assigned.

The complaint shows, among other things, that on the 28th day of May, 1887, the relator and Minerva Miller entered into a partnership for the purpose of dealing in oils, paints, wall pap?r, etc., and that such partnership continued until the 13th day of February, 1889, when it was dissolved…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Pond v. KimballMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1869
  2. Deeter v. SellersIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  3. Love v. BlairIndiana Supreme Court · 1880
  4. Purple v. FarringtonIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
  5. Goudy v. WerbeIndiana Supreme Court · 1889

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Ex parte KurtzhalzOhio Court of Appeals · 1943

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API