United States v. Koistinen
United States Court of Military Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion of the Court
COX, Judge:
A military judge sitting alone as a special court-martial convicted appellant, contrary to his pleas, of a single specification of wrongfully using lysergic acid diethyla*280mide (LSD), in violation of Article 112a, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 USC § 912a.1 We granted review of the following issues:
I
WHETHER THE ACCUSED’S 6TH AMENDMENT RIGHT TO BE CONFRONTED BY THE WITNESSES AGAINST HIM WAS VIOLATED WHEN THE MILITARY JUDGE ADMITTED UNDER MIL.R.EVID. 804(b)(3) MR. AMARO’S OUT-OF-COURT STATEMENT WHEN HE KNEW THAT SOME UNKNOWN PORTION OF IT WAS FALSE.
II
WHETHER…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Bruton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Ohio v. RobertsSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Malloy v. HoganSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- California v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Snyder v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- United States v. HyderCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1997
- United States v. GreerUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1991
- United States v. MurphyU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1990
- United States v. WindUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1989
- United States v. StroupUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1989
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.