Legal Opinion

Nix v. Born

Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)

Decided January 12, 1994No. 08-93-00021-CVPublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

KOEHLER, Justice.

In a damage suit which arose out of the sale of real estate, the jury found for the seller/plaintiff on three different theories of recovery, including the theory that the real estate agent along with two others had engaged in a civil conspiracy to breach the fiduciary duty owed by the agent to the seller. The tidal court rendered judgment on the civil conspiracy verdict, awarding the seller a total of $280,800 in actual and exemplary damages, plus prejudgment interest, jointly and severally against each of the three defendants.

Appellant in four points of error 1…

Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Cain v. BainTexas Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Holt Atherton Industries, Inc. v. HeineTexas Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Massey v. Armco Steel Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Alm v. Aluminum Co. of AmericaTexas Supreme Court · 1986
  5. Stafford v. StaffordTexas Supreme Court · 1987

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. City of Alamo v. Casas, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1997
  2. America West Airlines, Inc. v. Tope, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)1996
  3. In Re Kerr, Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)2009
  4. Albertson's Holdings, LLC, Albertson's, LLC, and New Albertson's, Inc. v. Ruth Kay and Frank KayCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2017
  5. In Re Missouri Pacific Railroad, Texas Court of Appeals, 12th District (Tyler)1998

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API