Legal Opinion

In Re Kerr

Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)

Decided July 30, 2009No. 09-09-00079-CVPublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

In this mandamus proceeding, relators J. Robinson Kerr, 1 individually, James E. Thorp, individually, Thorp Petroleum Corporation, Cobra Operating Company, and Hal Energy Company, challenge the trial court’s denial of their motions to transfer venue. See Tex. Civ. Prao. & Rem.Code Ann. § 15.0642 (Vernon 2002). Section 15.011 of the Texas Civil Practice and Remedies Code requires this action be brought in the county in which the property at issue is located. See Tex. Civ. Prao. & Rem.Code Ann. § 15.011 (Vernon 2002). We conditionally grant the petition for writ of mandamus.

The Dispute

Rea…

3Cases cited19 opinions

  1. International Bankers Life Insurance Co. v. HollowayTexas Supreme Court · 1963
  2. In Re Missouri Pacific Railroad Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Yzaguirre v. KCS Resources, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Renwar Oil Corporation v. LancasterTexas Supreme Court · 1955
  5. In Re Applied Chemical Magnesias Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 2006

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by17 opinions

  1. Garcia v. Garza, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2010
  2. in Re Mark P. Hardwick, Individually and D/B/A Mark P. Hardwick Oil & Gas Properties and Mark P. Hardwick, LLC, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2012
  3. in Re Amanda Hayward and TWCS Operations Pty LtdCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2015
  4. in Re: Valerie Dyer Harding, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2018
  5. Bayer Crop Science, LP, Monsanto Company, and BASF Corporation v. Andy Timmons, Inc., D/B/A Lost Draw Vineyards, Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)2022

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API