Legal Opinion

Rawson v. Idaho State Board of Cosmetology

Idaho Court of Appeals

Decided January 25, 1985No. 14417PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BURNETT, Judge.

This is an appeal by the Board of Cosmetology from a declaratory judgment hold ing that the Board may not impose an educational requirement upon cosmetologists from other states who apply for reciprocal licenses in Idaho. On a related issue, the judgment also declares that Glenda Rawson, the applicant in this case, has not engaged in any conduct disqualifying her from obtaining a license. For reasons explained below, we affirm that part of the judgment which strikes down the educational requirement, but we vacate the judgment insofar as it adjudicates the issue of improper…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Esther HAYDEN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF MT. PLEASANT, TEXAS, a Corporation, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1979
  2. Union Pacific Railroad v. Board of Tax AppealsIdaho Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Hill v. Board of County CommissionersIdaho Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Miller v. MartinIdaho Supreme Court · 1970
  5. Pumice Products, Inc. v. RobisonIdaho Supreme Court · 1957

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. American Falls Reservoir District No. 2 v. Idaho Department of Water ResourcesIdaho Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Golay v. LoomisIdaho Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Dea Haight v. Idaho Dept of TransportationIdaho Supreme Court · 2018
  4. Idaho County Nursing Home v. Idaho Department of Health & WelfareIdaho Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Johnson v. City of HomedaleIdaho Court of Appeals · 1990

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API