Legal Opinion

Smith v. Sorensen

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided May 2, 1986No. 84-940PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Brodkey, J., Retired.

Benard Smith appeals from an order of the district court for Douglas County affirming a decision of the Nebraska Department of Labor Appeal Tribunal, which affirmed a decision of the Nebraska Department of Labor, division of employment, which had ordered a 9-week reduction in Smith’s unemployment benefits. Smith’s unemployment was caused by his dismissal from the public works department of the City of Omaha, which dismissal was affirmed by the personnel board of the City of Omaha. We affirm the district court’s order.

By way of background, it appears that Smith commenced…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Warner Co. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
  2. Gregory v. AndersonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1961
  3. Sopko Unemployment Compensation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
  4. Stuart v. Omaha Porkers, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Smith v. City of OmahaNebraska Supreme Court · 1985

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Dolan v. SvitakNebraska Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Poore v. City of MindenNebraska Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Great Plains Container Co. v. HiattNebraska Supreme Court · 1987
  4. O'KEEFE v. Tabitha, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1987
  5. Tuma v. Omaha Public Power DistrictNebraska Supreme Court · 1987

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API