Legal Opinion

State v. Wiese

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided November 3, 2010No. 07081708; A138481PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtOrtega, J.

Defendant appeals a judgment of conviction for two counts each of sodomy in the first degree, ORS 163.405, and sexual abuse in the first degree, ORS 163.427, and one count of rape in the first degree, ORS 163.375. He assigns error to the trial court’s imposition of concurrent sentences of 300 months for each count of sodomy and rape, arguing that those sentences are disproportionate to the offenses and are cruel and unusual punishment in violation of Article I, section 16, of the Oregon Constitution and the Eighth Amendment to the United States Constitution. For the reasons stated below, we…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. ThompsonOregon Supreme Court · 1999
  2. State v. Rodriguez/BuckOregon Supreme Court · 2009
  3. State v. WheelerOregon Supreme Court · 2007
  4. State v. AlwingerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2010

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. WoodardSupreme Court of Kansas · 2012
  2. State v. ParkerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2013
  3. State v. ThomasCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2018
  4. State v. McCombsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2024
  5. State v. LancasterCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2025

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API