Legal Opinion

State v. Wheeler

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided December 28, 2007No. S054543PublishedCited by 47 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBalmer, J.

The issue in this criminal case is whether the life sentences that the trial court imposed on defendant violate the proportionality clause of Article I, section 16, of the Oregon Constitution, which provides that “all penalties shall be proportioned to the offense.” A jury convicted defendant of 18 criminal charges, including sexual abuse, sodomy, and using a child in a display of sexually explicit conduct, based on conduct involving three boys between the ages of nine and 15. Defendant previously had been convicted of two felony sex crimes. Based on the convictions in this case and…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Solem v. HelmSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Harmelin v. MichiganSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  3. Weems v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
  4. Ewing v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  5. State Ex Rel. Huddleston v. SawyerOregon Supreme Court · 1997

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by47 opinions

  1. State v. Rodriguez/BuckOregon Supreme Court · 2009
  2. People v. ClemonsIllinois Supreme Court · 2012
  3. State v. AlwingerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2010
  4. State v. BartolOregon Supreme Court · 2021
  5. State v. DavidsonOregon Supreme Court · 2016

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API