State v. Parker
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtWollheim, J.
Defendant appeals judgments of conviction for 10 counts of first-degree encouraging child sexual abuse, challenging the constitutional proportionality of the sentences imposed in the judgments. ORS 163.684 (2009).1 We review for errors of law to determine whether defendant’s sentence “[e]xceeds the maximum allowable by law” or “ [i] s unconstitutionally cruel and unusual.” ORS 138.050; State v. Barajas, 254 Or App 106, 108, 292 P3d 636 (2012), rev den, 353 Or 747 (2013). We affirm.
Defendant was investigated for purchasing and using child pornography and was contacted by federal investigators…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- State v. Rodriguez/BuckOregon Supreme Court · 2009
- State v. StonemanOregon Supreme Court · 1996
- State v. ReevesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012
- State v. AlwingerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2010
- State v. Andrew William BetnarCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2007
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Real v. NoothCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015
- State v. LancasterCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2025
- State v. LicenceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2025
- State v. DelpCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2019
- State v. LicenceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2025
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.