Auerback v. Maslia
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Deen, Presiding Judge.
We agree with the appellees that the motion granted by the trial court was in fact a motion for judgment on the pleadings. The hearing was scheduled two days after the motion was made; in the absence of waiver this would be impermissible if the motion were one for summary judgment. Register v. Kandlbinder, 231 Ga. 786 (1 c) (204 SE2d 145).
Judgment on the pleadings may be granted only where it appears from the pleadings themselves that the person against whom judgment is sought can in no event prevail. McClure v. Leasco Computer, Inc., 134 Ga. App. 871, 873 (216 SE2d…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Wilkes v. RicksCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1972
- Gresham v. SymmersSupreme Court of Georgia · 1971
- Harris v. HarrisSupreme Court of Georgia · 1972
- McClure v. Leasco Computer, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1975
- Register v. KandlbinderSupreme Court of Georgia · 1974
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Premium Distributing Co. v. National Distributing Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1981
- Kickasola v. Jim Wallace Oil Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1978
- Attwell v. Heritage Bank Mt. PleasantCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1982
- Hulsey Pool Co. v. TroutmanCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1983
- Raintree Farms, Inc. v. Stripping Center, Ltd.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1983
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.