Legal Opinion

Sherwood v. Jackson

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 1, 1932No. Docket No. 8203PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSturtevant, J.

Heretofore the plaintiff and and defendant were partners; an application to dissolve the partnership was presented to the court and a receiver was appointed; after the appointment of the receiver, the plaintiff, who had theretofore been the managing partner, was named as manager under the receiver; while so acting she suffered personal injuries caused by the defendant and commenced an action to recover damages, and in that action she obtained a judgment awarding her $2,005 and costs. No order staying execution was entered. Thereafter on May 22, 1931, the plaintiff appeared ex parte in the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Proceedings Supplementary to Execution, under a Judgment in Favor of Rader v. GoldoffAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1928

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Taylor v. S & M Lamp Co.California Court of Appeal · 1961
  2. Baum v. BaumCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
  3. Pischke v. Murray (In Re Pischke)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Virginia · 1981
  4. DeMartini v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
  5. Myrick v. Second National Bank of ClearwaterDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1976

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API