Conrad v. Ward

After several unsuccessful attempts to locate defendant Clarence Gr. Ward in order to serve him with the complaint and summons, plaintiffs were granted a court order pursuant to GCR 1963, 105.8.1 The court order author*690ized substituted service of process by tacking the summons and complaint to the front doors of certain specified buildings, “and, by leaving a summons and a copy of the complaint and this order at defendant’s usual place of abode with some member of his family therein residing, who is of suitable age and discretion, informing that person of the nature of the process served”.…