Legal Opinion

Krueger v. Williams

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 22, 1981No. Docket Nos. 59743, 61861. (Calendar Nos. 2, 3)PublishedCited by 48 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFitzgerald, J.

We are asked to construe GCR 1963, 105.8. In the Krueger case, we must decide whether the rule will permit substituted service of process upon a defendant’s liability insurer. In the Rodgers case, we must determine if this rule au*153thorizes service of process by publication to obtain personal jurisdiction over a defendant.

I

In Krueger v Williams, plaintiff and defendant were involved in an automobile accident. At the time, both parties were insured by the Detroit Automobile Inter-Insurance Exchange (hereafter DAIIE). Plaintiff attempted to negotiate a settlement with DAIIE. When resolution…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  3. Pennoyer v. NeffSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  4. Milliken v. MeyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  5. Shaffer v. HeitnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1977

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by48 opinions

  1. Hartwell v. MarquezWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Lawrence M Clarke, Inc v. Richco Construction, IncMichigan Supreme Court · 2011
  3. Bullington v. CorbellMichigan Court of Appeals · 2011
  4. Mooring v. KaufmanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1983
  5. Poteet v. BethkeIndiana Court of Appeals · 1987

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API