Legal Opinion
Weyerhaeuser Co. v. King County
Washington Supreme Court
Decided March 29, 1979No. 44770PublishedCited by 36 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHorowitz, J.
The question here concerns the power of a local government to regulate forest practices within its shorelines under the Shoreline Management Act of 1971. RCW 90.58. Appellant King County placed three water quality control conditions in contest here on a substantial development permit issued to Weyerhaeuser Company for construction of a logging road and bridge within the shorelines of Calligan Lake. The conditions were modified and upheld by the Shorelines Hearings Board. Respondent appealed to the Superior Court for Thurston County, which struck the conditions on the ground the County was…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Bethlehem Steel Co. v. New York State Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Gruen v. State Tax CommissionWashington Supreme Court · 1949
- Hama Hama Co. v. Shorelines Hearings BoardWashington Supreme Court · 1975
- Leschi Improvement Council v. Washington State Highway CommissionWashington Supreme Court · 1974
- Flanders v. MorrisWashington Supreme Court · 1977
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- Cowiche Canyon Conservancy v. BosleyWashington Supreme Court · 1992
- Amalgamated Transit Union Local 587 v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 2000
- Buechel v. Department of EcologyWashington Supreme Court · 1994
- Retired Public Employees Council v. CharlesWashington Supreme Court · 2003
- Washington Education Ass'n v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1982
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.