Legal Opinion
Kimberly Knitwear, Inc. v. Mid-West Pool Car Ass'n
City of New York Municipal Court
Decided September 21, 1959PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGuy Gilbert Ribaudo, J.
In this action for goods sold and delivered by plaintiff to defendant, the Neusteter Co., and shipped pursuant to its instructions, Neusteter appeared specially seeking to dismiss the complaint because of nonservice upon a proper person and because of being a Colorado corporation not engaged “ in doing business ” in New York.
Amenability to process is asserted by plaintiff because of listing in the Manhattan telephone directory, listing on the building directory at 1441 Broadway, and listing on the outer door of the offices so designated.
Immunity from process is asserted by Neusteter because…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- McGee v. International Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Rosenberg Bros. & Co. v. Curtis Brown Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Bomze v. Nardis Sportswear, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1948
- Sterling Novelty Corp. v. Frank & Hirsch Distributing Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1949
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Ciprari v. Servicos Aereos Cruzeiro Do Sul, SA (Cruzeiro)District Court, S.D. New York · 1964
- Grossman v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1988