Legal Opinion

Jane Doe I and Jane Doe II v. Edwin Chaparro

District Court, D. New Jersey

Decided April 22, 2026No. 3:25-cv-13961Unknown

1Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY JANE DOE I and JANE DOE II, Plaintiffs, Civil Action No. 25-13961 (ZNQ) (RLS) v. OPINION EDWIN CHAPARRO, Defendant. QURAISHI, District Judge THIS MATTER comes before the Court upon two motions: Plaintiffs Jane Doe I and Jane Doe II’s Motion for Default Judgment (“Motion for Default Judgment,” ECF No. 6); and pro se Defendant Edwin Chaparro’s (“Defendant”) informal Motion to Dismiss the Complaint (“Motion to Dismiss,” ECF No. 12). Plaintiffs filed opposition to Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss. (“Opp’n Br.,” ECF No. 15.)…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  4. World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  5. Phillips v. County of AlleghenyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2008

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API