Legal Opinion
In Re the Estate of Rosenberg
New York Court of Appeals
Decided November 26, 1935PublishedCited by 37 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCrouch, J.
Jerome Rosenberg, a life beneficiary of a trust created by the will of Henry Rosenberg, instituted a proceeding in the Surrogate’s Court to secure an adjustment of the rights of his creditors to the trust income, which was under the provisions of section 15 of the Personal Property Law (Cons. Laws, ch. 41) and section 103 of the Real Property Law (Cons. Laws, ch. 50), not assignable by the petitioner, and exempt from garnishee execution except (Civ. Prac. Act, § 684) as to ten per cent thereof. A number of judgments against petitioner were represented in the proceeding by a receiver of the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Burnet v. HarmelSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- United States v. SnyderSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Wetmore v. . WetmoreNew York Court of Appeals · 1896
- Fink v. O'NeilSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
- Custer v. McCutcheonSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- Glass City Bank v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- United States v. City of GreenvilleCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1941
- United States v. Long Island Drug Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1940
- Richard D. Leuschner v. First Western Bank and Trust Company, a California Banking Corporation, and United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1958
- United States v. Aetna Life Ins. Co. of Hartford, Conn.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1942
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.