Legal Opinion

United States v. Aetna Life Ins. Co. of Hartford, Conn.

District Court, D. Connecticut

Decided January 8, 1942No. 74PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HINCKS, District Judge.

1. The taxpayer, one Frank P. Nistle of Pennsylvania, on or about March 4, 1920, entered into a policy of life insurance having substantial endowment features with the defendant, the Aetna Life Insurance Company of Hartford, Connecticut. Under the terms of the policy, power was reserved to the taxpayer to elect to receive in lieu of the specified endowment benefits the stated cash value of the policy; also to change the beneficiary designated to receive the death benefit upon his written request “accompanied with the policy for proper endorsement.” Ever since April 5,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Cannon v. NicholasCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1935
  2. In Re the Estate of RosenbergNew York Court of Appeals · 1935
  3. Blacklock v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  4. Allen v. Home National BankSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1935
  5. Neary v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1918

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. United States v. BessSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  2. Fuentes v. Tribunal de Distrito de Puerto RicoSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1952
  3. United States v. Cornelius W. SullivanCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1964
  4. United States v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1942
  5. United States v. Louis H. MitchellCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1965

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API