Legal Opinion
Culhane v. Foley
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided March 28, 1940PublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLummus, J.
Upon a petition under G. L. (Ter. Ed.) c. 215, § 39, the Probate Court ascertained and determined the amount due the petitioner for professional services, including expenses, as an attorney at law, rendered to the respondent as proponent and executor of the will of Kate S. Gallaher, in connection with the administration of her estate, to be the amount of $12,000. Moushegian v. Sheppard, 279 Mass. 49. The respondent appealed.
The judge made no report of facts. The evidence, however, is reported. The petitioner contends that the failure to include in the reported evidence the printed record on…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Spiegel v. Beacon Participations, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1937
- Cummings v. National Shawmut Bank of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1933
- Long v. GeorgeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1937
- City of Boston v. DolanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1937
- Trade Mutual Liability Insurance v. PetersMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Lowell Bar Ass'n v. LoebMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1943
- City of Boston v. SantosuossoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1940
- In re KeenanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1943
- Bernhardt v. Atlantic Finance Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1942
- R. H. White Co. v. MurphyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1942
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.