Legal Opinion · Dissent

In re the Voluntary Dissolution of Radom & Neidorff, Inc.

New York Court of Appeals

Decided April 22, 1954Published

1DissentFuld, J.

Section 103 of the General Corporation Law, insofar as here relevant, permits a petition for dissolution of a corporation by the holders of one half of the shares of stock entitled to vote for directors “ if the votes of its stockholders are so divided that they cannot elect a board of directors ”. That is the precise situation in the case before us, for the petition explicitly recites that petitioner Badom and respondent Neidorff “ are hopelessly deadlocked with respect to the management and operation of the corporation ” and that serious disputes have developed between them with the result…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Duane Jones Co. v. BurkeNew York Court of Appeals · 1954
  2. Benintendi v. Kenton Hotel, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1945
  3. Boothe v. Summit Coal Mining Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1909
  4. Bowen v. Bowen-Romer Flour Mills Corp.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1923
  5. Saltz v. Saltz Bros.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1936

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API