In re the Voluntary Dissolution of Radom & Neidorff, Inc.
New York Court of Appeals
1DissentFuld, J.
Section 103 of the General Corporation Law, insofar as here relevant, permits a petition for dissolution of a corporation by the holders of one half of the shares of stock entitled to vote for directors “ if the votes of its stockholders are so divided that they cannot elect a board of directors ”. That is the precise situation in the case before us, for the petition explicitly recites that petitioner Badom and respondent Neidorff “ are hopelessly deadlocked with respect to the management and operation of the corporation ” and that serious disputes have developed between them with the result…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Duane Jones Co. v. BurkeNew York Court of Appeals · 1954
- Benintendi v. Kenton Hotel, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1945
- Boothe v. Summit Coal Mining Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1909
- Bowen v. Bowen-Romer Flour Mills Corp.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1923
- Saltz v. Saltz Bros.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1936
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.