Legal Opinion

State v. Floyd

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided June 7, 1957No. 722PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWiNBORNE, C. J.

The first assignment of error brought up for consideration is based on exceptions to portions of the charge lifted out of text, pertaining to the subject of alibi. But considering the charge contextually it does not appear that there is prejudicial error. What is said by this Court, in this respect, in S. v. Bridgers, 233 N.C. 577, 64 S.E. 2d 867, in S. v. Minton, 234 N.C. 716 (at 726), 68 S.E. 2d 844, and in S. v. Cephus, 239 N.C. 521, 80 S.E. 2d 147, is pertinent here. There this Court considered that error prejudicial to defendant did not appear. And in both the Bridgers and Minton cases…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. State v. MintonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
  2. State v. . TuckerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
  3. State v. GraysonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  4. State v. . JohnsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1872
  5. State v. BridgersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. McNeilCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
  2. State v. SherronCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API