Teresa Wagner v. Carolyn Jones
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
BEAM, Circuit Judge.
Teresa Wagner appeals from the district court’s denial of her motion for new trial, arguing that significant errors in the verdict formulation process entitle her to a new trial. Under the standard we apply today, we conclude that the district court abused its discretion in denying Wagner’s motion. Accordingly, we reverse and remand for a new trial.
I. BACKGROUND
This case returns to us for the second time following reversal and remand of the district court’s initial summary judgment ruling. See Wagner v. Jones, 664 F.3d 259, 275 (8th Cir.2011) (remanding for “further…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Koon v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Allen v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- Thaddeus C. Pulla, Appellant/cross-Appellee v. Amoco Oil Company, Appellee/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1996
- Nails v. S & R, INC.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1994
- Brister v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1855
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Dietz v. BouldinSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
- Rocky Dietz v. Hillary BouldinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
- Bamford, Inc. v. Regent Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2016
- Rocky Dietz v. Hillary BouldinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
- State v. PlateroCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2020