Legal Opinion
City of Turlock v. Paul M. Zagaris, Inc.
California Court of Appeal
Decided March 30, 1989No. F009935PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
FRANSON, P. J.
Statement of the Case and Facts
Appellant Paul M. Zagaris, Inc., appeals from the trial court’s ruling that it take nothing in respondent City of Turlock’s eminent domain action or on its cross-complaint for money damages. Appellant contends the trial court erroneously ruled it was not entitled to a broker’s commission in this action.
In early 1986, representatives of appellant, a real estate broker, approached Irving and Roylene Garcia regarding the sale of their property, a 19.91-acre parcel adjacent to the Turlock city limits, to Joaquin Construction Company (Joaquin).…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- County of San Diego v. MillerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
- McMahan's of Santa Monica v. City of Santa MonicaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
- Claremont Terrace Homeowners' Ass'n v. United StatesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
- Preston v. Carnation Co.California Court of Appeal · 1961
- Paulsen v. LeadbetterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Torelli v. J. P. Enterprises, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1997