Legal Opinion

Smith v. State

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided February 8, 1967PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCurrie, C. J.

We are here confronted with these three issues:(1) Must a defendant, whose sentence has been withheld and who is placed on probation, be accorded the right to have counsel at the subsequent sentencing following revocation of probation unless he intelligently, voluntarily and understandingly waives such right?(2) If the answer is in the affirmative, can the alleged error of failure to obtain such an intelligent, voluntary and understanding waiver of counsel be raised by way of writ of error to review the judgment of sentence?(3) If it cannot be so raised, can it be raised by motion to vacate…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Fay v. NoiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. State v. StricklandWisconsin Supreme Court · 1965
  3. Commonwealth Ex Rel. Remeriez v. MaroneySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1964
  4. Babbitt v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1964
  5. State v. KoernerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1966

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Hayes v. StatesWisconsin Supreme Court · 1970
  2. Neely v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1970
  3. McMillian v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Cowart v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1967
  5. Taylor v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1973

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API