Stone v. Advance America
District Court, S.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR CLASS CERTIFICATION, DENYING MOTION TO STRIKE, AND SETTING REMAINING PRETRIAL DATES
ANTHONY J. BATTAGLIA, District Judge.
Plaintiffs’ motion to certify a class of consumers was fully briefed last year' — before the case was transferred to the undersigned. [# 173] The Supreme Court’s June 2011 decision in Wal-Mart v. Dukes, — U.S. -, 131 S.Ct. 2541, 180 L.Ed.2d 374 (2011), impacted Ninth Circuit ease law. The Court heard argument on the first available date, November 14, 2011. For the reasons stated below, the Court DENIES Defendants’ motion to strike the expert report…
2Cases cited43 opinions
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Kumho Tire Co. v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. DukesSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- Hanlon v. Chrysler Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Apple Inc. v. Superior Court of San Diego Cnty., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- Apple Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2018
- Beatty v. PHH Mortgage CorporationDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2019
- Martha Jennifer Camp, Adam Camp, William E. Thompson, and Juanita Thompson, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated v. Ohana Military Communities, LLC, Hunt MH Property Management, LLC, DOE Defendants 1-20District Court, D. Hawaii · 2026