Legal Opinion
Norton v. Hughes
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided April 18, 2000No. 92,357PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWinchester, J.
T1 This matter concerns the legal mail-practice action brought by plaintiff/appellant Fred E. Norton, D.D.S., (Norton) against defendants/appellees Carl Hughes, Leo Winters, II, and Hughes & Grant (attorneys) and defendants Joe E. White, Jr., Allan Mitchell, and Kyle Goodwin. This litigation had its roots in an action filed by attorneys on behalf of Norton against third parties, to recover damages for fraud, breach of contract, breach of warranties, and violations of the Texas Deceptive Trade Practices-Consumer Protection Act (DTPA) codified at V.T.C.A., Bus. & C. § 17.41 et. seq. Norton…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Manley v. BrownSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1999
- Brown v. NicholsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1997
- Weeks Ex Rel. Weeks v. Wedgewood Village, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1976
- Daugherty v. Farmers Cooperative Ass'nSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1984
- Wabaunsee v. HarrisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1980
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Jennings v. BadgettSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2010
- In Re the Reinstatement of DeBackerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2008
- Leak-Gilbert v. FahleSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2002
- Pate v. AlianCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2002
- BJORKMAN v. NOBLESupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2025
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.