Parshall v. Minneapolis & St. L. Ry. Co.
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Minnesota
At Law. On motion to set aside verdict of jury. Action by R. P. Parshall against the Minneapolis & St. Louis Railway Company for injuries received by a collision of trains. Verdict for plaintiff, and damages assessed at $8,000, which verdict defendant moved to set aside.
1Opinion of the CourtBrewer, J.
This case was tried at the last term of this court, before Judge Nelson and a jury, and a nxotioix for a ixew tidal was argued before me on a bill of exceptions. The case involved the same facts presented in a case just tried at this term, whei’e at a crossing of the Chicago, Milwaukee & St Paul Railway and of the Minneapolis & St. Louis Railway tivo trains collided, and the plaintiff, a passenger on the Milwaukee train, was injured. I always decline to hear a motion for a new trial in a case tried before another judge, unless the case stands upon some question of law sent by that judge to be…
2Cited by7 opinions
- Thomas F. Maher v. Isthmian Steamship CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1958
- St. Louis & S. F. R. Co. v. BrownSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
- Keith Gulbranson v. Duluth, Missabe and Iron Range Railway CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1990
- Armentrout v. Virginian Ry. Co.District Court, S.D. West Virginia · 1947
- United States v. PetersonDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1938
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.