Legal Opinion
United States v. Peterson
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided September 16, 1938No. Nos. 7320, 7321PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MARIS, Circuit Judge.
The defendant, Bill Peterson, was convicted upon two indictments charging violation of counterfeiting laws. He has moved for a new trial and in arrest of judgment. He has, however, failed to present a bill of exceptions and since the trial took place nearly three months ago my memory of the testimony and charge is not sufficiently distinct to enable me to pass upon those reasons assigned for a new trial which are based upon alleged trial errors. It would, therefore, be improper for me to grant a new trial for any of these reasons (Parshall v. Minneapolis & St. L. R. Co.,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Rosen v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
- Commonwealth v. DeitrickSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1908
- Dillon v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1909
- Parshall v. Minneapolis & St. L. Ry. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Minnesota · 1888
- Melaragno v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1937
3Cited by5 opinions
- Shotwell Manufacturing Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- United States of America Ex Rel. Alvin R. Drew v. David N. Myers, Superintendent, State Correctional Institution, Graterford, PennsylvaniaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1964
- Gillars v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1950
- Jordon v. BondyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1940
- United States v. PerlsteinDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1941