Considine v. Murphy

BARNES, Presiding Judge.

Cecily Considine filed suit against George W. Murphy and Murphy & Mclnvale, PC. (collectively, “Murphy”), alleging that Murphy committed malpractice while serving as the receiver of a business partly owned by Considine. Along with his answer, Murphy filed a motion to dismiss, arguing that he was a court-appointed receiver and *317was therefore immune from suit. Two days later, the trial court signed an order granting the motion to dismiss, finding that “because Defendants were acting in their capacity as a court appointed receiver, they are entitled to official immunity.”…