Legal Opinion

Cecily Considine v. George W. Murphy

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided March 26, 2014No. A13A2454Published

1Opinion of the Court

SECOND DIVISION BARNES, P. J., MILLER, and RAY, JJ. NOTICE: Motions for reconsideration must be physically received in our clerk’s office within ten days of the date of decision to be deemed timely filed. http://www.gaappeals.us/rules/ March 26, 2014 In the Court of Appeals of Georgia A13A2454. CONSIDINE v. MURPHY et al. BARNES, Presiding Judge. Cecily Considine filed suit against George W. Murphy and Murphy & McInvale, P.C., an accounting firm (collectively, “Murphy”), alleging that Murphy committed malpractice while serving as the receiver of a business partly owned by Considine. In…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Cameron v. LangSupreme Court of Georgia · 2001
  2. Adams v. HazelwoodSupreme Court of Georgia · 1999
  3. Department of Transportation v. DupreeCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2002
  4. Harvey v. NicholsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2003
  5. Schmidt v. AdamsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1993

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API