Dearing v. State
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Pope, Presiding Judge.
Amanda Dearing and John David Edmondson, Jr. appeal the order granting the State’s motion to dismiss their answers under OCGA §. 16-13-49 in this forfeiture case. For the following reasons, we conclude that the answer Edmondson filed was sufficient under OCGA § 16-13-49 (o) (3). Accordingly, we reverse the trial court’s dismissal of his answer and remand the case as to the property he claims for further proceedings. In contrast, we affirm the trial court’s dismissal of Dearing’s answer on the basis that it was insufficient to satisfy the statutory requirements.
On October…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- State of Ga. v. AlfordSupreme Court of Georgia · 1994
- Rojas v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1998
- Jarrett v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1996
- Watson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1998
- Williams v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1996
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Charles H. Wesley Education Foundation, Inc. v. State Election BoardSupreme Court of Georgia · 2007
- Portee v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2006
- Baker v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2004
- Arreola-Soto v. State of GeorgiaCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2012
- Considine v. MurphyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2013
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.