Whitney v. Horn
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
McKEE, Circuit Judge.
A jury convicted Raymond Whitney of first degree murder in state court, and sentenced him to death. We are now asked to review the district court’s grant of a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The district court concluded that Whitney was entitled to habeas relief because the trial judge erred in instructing the jury on the defense of voluntary intoxication under Pennsylvania law. For the reasons that follow, we will reverse and remand for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.
I. Factual Background
At approximately 4:00 a.m. on…
2Cases cited63 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Coleman v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Schlup v. DeloSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Murray v. CarrierSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Whitney v. HornCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2002
- United States v. SmithDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2002