Legal Opinion

Smith v. Elder

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided March 22, 1993No. 92-948PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Donald L. Corbin, Justice.

Ted Smith, separate appellant, an attorney, was rendering tax and other personal services for plaintiffs in this case. In the fall of 1976, Mr. Smith approached plaintiffs about investing in a limited partnership he was forming. Mr. Smith advised plaintiffs they would receive tax benefits by entering into the limited partnership. On November 16, 1976, Washington Farm was formed as an Arkansas limited partnership with limited partners, John P. and Margaret G. Elder, Vance N. and Jean E. Elder, N. Dwight and Helen Faye Heathman and G. Hugh and Charlotte Smith, husbands…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. First Nat. Bank of Crossett v. GriffinSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1992
  2. Goldsby v. FairleySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1992
  3. Arkansas Game & Fish Commission v. LindseySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1987
  4. Holley v. HolleySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1978
  5. Continental Ozark, Inc. v. LairCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1989

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Alexander v. FlakeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1995
  2. Ragar v. BrownSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1998
  3. Finagin v. Arkansas Development Finance AuthoritySupreme Court of Arkansas · 2003
  4. Smothers v. ClouetteSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1996
  5. Jamison v. Estate of GoodlettCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1997

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API