Legal Opinion

Plentino Realty, Ltd. v. Gitomer

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 13, 1995PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Order of the Supreme Court, New York County (Martin Evans, J.), entered November 15, 1994, which, inter alia, denied defendants’ motion for summary judgment, unanimously reversed to the extent appealed from, on the law, and the motion granted, with costs and disbursements payable by plaintiff.

*88Plaintiff’s opposition to the motion lacks evidentiary facts and is based simply on conclusory allegations, which are insufficient to defeat a motion for summary judgment (Rotuba Extruders v Ceppos, 46 NY2d 223, 231).

The tripartite test governing the establishment of a prima facie case for legal…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Rotuba Extruders, Inc. v. CepposNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
  2. Franklin v. WinardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
  3. Pacesetter Communications Corp. v. Solin & Breindel, P. C.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
  4. Marshall v. NachtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Schweizer v. MulvehillDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2000
  2. Levine v. Lacher & Lovell-TaylorAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  3. DiPlacidi v. WalshAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
  4. Colleran v. RockmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
  5. Farrauto v. KeowongwanYonkers City Court · 1995

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API