Franklin v. Winard
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Diane Lebedeff, J.), entered on or about October 27, 1992, which, insofar as appealed from, granted the motion by defendants Arthur I. Winard and Arthur I. Winard, P. C. ("the Winard defendants”) to dismiss the third, fourth, fifth, sixth and seventh causes of action of the plaintiff’s complaint pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) (7), with prejudice, as against the Winard defendants, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
On a motion addressed to the sufficiency of a complaint pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) (7), the facts pleaded are presumed to be true and accorded…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Stroock v. BeltraminiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
- Marshall v. NachtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
- Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. GlassAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980
- Mark Hampton, Inc. v. BergreenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
- Mance v. ManceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- Pellegrino v. FileAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
- Estate of Nevelson v. Carro, Spanbock, Kaster & CuiffoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- Herbert H. Post & Co. v. Sidney Bitterman, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- Russo v. Feder, Kaszovitz, Isaacson, Weber, Skala & Bass, LLPAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
- Dweck Law Firm, L. L. P. v. MannAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.